Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 255
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0301836, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656978

RESUMEN

Driven by the goal of achieving sustainable development and carbon neutrality. Addressing environmental pollution and remediating land damage have become critical challenges in resource-based cities and regions with low land use efficiency. As a response, this study focuses on the 23 provinces where China's coal resource-based cities are situated. Utilizing data from 2014 to 2020, this research employs the SBM-Undesirable model, which considers undesirable outputs in efficiency calculations, and the Tobit regression test. It aims to explore the spatio-temporal variations in industrial transformation within resource-based cities and its impact on the efficiency of green space utilization. Furthermore, it analyzes the characteristics and the extent of the influence of factors such as industrial structure adjustments on urban land use efficiency, maximizing the output of land as a factor of production. The results show that: (1) Over the 7-year period studied, China consistently made nationwide adjustments to land area and land use structure to meet the needs of urban development (2) The regression test results show that the industrial transformation of resource-based cities can promote the improvement of green space utilization efficiency. The positive influence coefficient is 0.064 and is significant at a 1% level. (3) Environmental regulation, government expenditure, international trade, and green cover play a positive role in promoting green land use. The study provides valuable insights for policymakers and urban planners seeking to foster sustainable development in resource-based cities.


Asunto(s)
Ciudades , Carbón Mineral , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Desarrollo Sostenible , China , Desarrollo Sostenible/tendencias , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/métodos , Contaminación Ambiental , Humanos
6.
Nature ; 626(7997): 45-57, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38297170

RESUMEN

The linear production and consumption of plastics today is unsustainable. It creates large amounts of unnecessary and mismanaged waste, pollution and carbon dioxide emissions, undermining global climate targets and the Sustainable Development Goals. This Perspective provides an integrated technological, economic and legal view on how to deliver a circular carbon and plastics economy that minimizes carbon dioxide emissions. Different pathways that maximize recirculation of carbon (dioxide) between plastics waste and feedstocks are outlined, including mechanical, chemical and biological recycling, and those involving the use of biomass and carbon dioxide. Four future scenarios are described, only one of which achieves sufficient greenhouse gas savings in line with global climate targets. Such a bold system change requires 50% reduction in future plastic demand, complete phase-out of fossil-derived plastics, 95% recycling rates of retrievable plastics and use of renewable energy. It is hard to overstate the challenge of achieving this goal. We therefore present a roadmap outlining the scale and timing of the economic and legal interventions that could possibly support this. Assessing the service lifespan and recoverability of plastic products, along with considerations of sufficiency and smart design, can moreover provide design principles to guide future manufacturing, use and disposal of plastics.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación Ambiental , Objetivos , Plásticos , Reciclaje , Desarrollo Sostenible , Biomasa , Dióxido de Carbono/análisis , Dióxido de Carbono/química , Dióxido de Carbono/metabolismo , Contaminación Ambiental/economía , Contaminación Ambiental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Contaminación Ambiental/prevención & control , Contaminación Ambiental/estadística & datos numéricos , Combustibles Fósiles , Calentamiento Global/prevención & control , Gases de Efecto Invernadero/análisis , Plásticos/síntesis química , Plásticos/economía , Plásticos/metabolismo , Plásticos/provisión & distribución , Reciclaje/economía , Reciclaje/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reciclaje/métodos , Reciclaje/tendencias , Energía Renovable , Desarrollo Sostenible/economía , Desarrollo Sostenible/legislación & jurisprudencia , Desarrollo Sostenible/tendencias , Tecnología/economía , Tecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tecnología/métodos , Tecnología/tendencias
7.
Nature ; 626(7998): 327-334, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38109939

RESUMEN

The pulp and paper industry is an important contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions1,2. Country-specific strategies are essential for the industry to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, given its vast heterogeneities across countries3,4. Here we develop a comprehensive bottom-up assessment of net greenhouse gas emissions of the domestic paper-related sectors for 30 major countries from 1961 to 2019-about 3.2% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions from the same period5-and explore mitigation strategies through 2,160 scenarios covering key factors. Our results show substantial differences across countries in terms of historical emissions evolution trends and structure. All countries can achieve net-zero emissions for their pulp and paper industry by 2050, with a single measure for most developed countries and several measures for most developing countries. Except for energy-efficiency improvement and energy-system decarbonization, tropical developing countries with abundant forest resources should give priority to sustainable forest management, whereas other developing countries should pay more attention to enhancing methane capture rate and reducing recycling. These insights are crucial for developing net-zero strategies tailored to each country and achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 for the pulp and paper industry.


Asunto(s)
Agricultura Forestal , Efecto Invernadero , Gases de Efecto Invernadero , Industrias , Internacionalidad , Papel , Desarrollo Sostenible , Madera , Efecto Invernadero/prevención & control , Efecto Invernadero/estadística & datos numéricos , Gases de Efecto Invernadero/análisis , Gases de Efecto Invernadero/aislamiento & purificación , Industrias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Industrias/estadística & datos numéricos , Metano/análisis , Metano/aislamiento & purificación , Reciclaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Reciclaje/tendencias , Países Desarrollados , Países en Desarrollo , Bosques , Agricultura Forestal/métodos , Agricultura Forestal/tendencias , Desarrollo Sostenible/tendencias , Clima Tropical
10.
Nature ; 624(7990): 92-101, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37957399

RESUMEN

Forests are a substantial terrestrial carbon sink, but anthropogenic changes in land use and climate have considerably reduced the scale of this system1. Remote-sensing estimates to quantify carbon losses from global forests2-5 are characterized by considerable uncertainty and we lack a comprehensive ground-sourced evaluation to benchmark these estimates. Here we combine several ground-sourced6 and satellite-derived approaches2,7,8 to evaluate the scale of the global forest carbon potential outside agricultural and urban lands. Despite regional variation, the predictions demonstrated remarkable consistency at a global scale, with only a 12% difference between the ground-sourced and satellite-derived estimates. At present, global forest carbon storage is markedly under the natural potential, with a total deficit of 226 Gt (model range = 151-363 Gt) in areas with low human footprint. Most (61%, 139 Gt C) of this potential is in areas with existing forests, in which ecosystem protection can allow forests to recover to maturity. The remaining 39% (87 Gt C) of potential lies in regions in which forests have been removed or fragmented. Although forests cannot be a substitute for emissions reductions, our results support the idea2,3,9 that the conservation, restoration and sustainable management of diverse forests offer valuable contributions to meeting global climate and biodiversity targets.


Asunto(s)
Secuestro de Carbono , Carbono , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Bosques , Biodiversidad , Carbono/análisis , Carbono/metabolismo , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/estadística & datos numéricos , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/tendencias , Actividades Humanas , Restauración y Remediación Ambiental/tendencias , Desarrollo Sostenible/tendencias , Calentamiento Global/prevención & control
11.
Nature ; 621(7980): 691, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37752259
17.
Nature ; 621(7977): 105-111, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37612501

RESUMEN

The critical temperature beyond which photosynthetic machinery in tropical trees begins to fail averages approximately 46.7 °C (Tcrit)1. However, it remains unclear whether leaf temperatures experienced by tropical vegetation approach this threshold or soon will under climate change. Here we found that pantropical canopy temperatures independently triangulated from individual leaf thermocouples, pyrgeometers and remote sensing (ECOSTRESS) have midday peak temperatures of approximately 34 °C during dry periods, with a long high-temperature tail that can exceed 40 °C. Leaf thermocouple data from multiple sites across the tropics suggest that even within pixels of moderate temperatures, upper canopy leaves exceed Tcrit 0.01% of the time. Furthermore, upper canopy leaf warming experiments (+2, 3 and 4 °C in Brazil, Puerto Rico and Australia, respectively) increased leaf temperatures non-linearly, with peak leaf temperatures exceeding Tcrit 1.3% of the time (11% for more than 43.5 °C, and 0.3% for more than 49.9 °C). Using an empirical model incorporating these dynamics (validated with warming experiment data), we found that tropical forests can withstand up to a 3.9 ± 0.5 °C increase in air temperatures before a potential tipping point in metabolic function, but remaining uncertainty in the plasticity and range of Tcrit in tropical trees and the effect of leaf death on tree death could drastically change this prediction. The 4.0 °C estimate is within the 'worst-case scenario' (representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5) of climate change predictions2 for tropical forests and therefore it is still within our power to decide (for example, by not taking the RCP 6.0 or 8.5 route) the fate of these critical realms of carbon, water and biodiversity3,4.


Asunto(s)
Aclimatación , Calor Extremo , Bosques , Fotosíntesis , Árboles , Clima Tropical , Aclimatación/fisiología , Australia , Brasil , Calor Extremo/efectos adversos , Calentamiento Global , Fotosíntesis/fisiología , Puerto Rico , Desarrollo Sostenible/legislación & jurisprudencia , Desarrollo Sostenible/tendencias , Árboles/fisiología , Hojas de la Planta/fisiología , Incertidumbre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...